So I'm going to have a rant about Indiana Jones. It might contain a few spoilers so if you don't want to know, just skip to the next box. Or skip the part inbetween the huge spoiler warning sections.
So yesterday Gemma and I headed down to Highpoint to catch this latest incarnation of the bloke in the fedora. Going into the cinema I was never really expecting that much - I'm a big fan of the previous films (less so Temple of Doom though) and while I was a bit excited about a new adventure, I knew that it had been 19 years since the last one, and that Lucas' obsession with CG shit would lose some of it's grounded-in-some-form-of-realism. Man, I was surprised. Very surprised.
Not that it was good. Oh no, it was far from it. For me, it was awful. Absolutely disappointing. But where to begin? The non-existent plot? The bland, boring, characters? The blending of CG and set pieces? The utterly absurd moments during the film? The lack of any type of suspense or humour? The farcical "villains" and the feeling that Indy was just reciting lines? The feeling of relief when the credits roll that I never have to sit through that shit again? The complete lack of any emotional feeling? The ending? Fuck. I'll just start typing. Here on lie ze spoilers.
Thar be spoilers below!
Firstly, the story. From what I gathered, it's set in the late 1950s and the Russians are trying to get a hold of this mythical artifact which will be better than any kind of weapon. Ok, thats basically the premise for Raiders just pushed back and with different villains. Here is where it starts going all odd. This "artifact" isn't one based in some form of human reality. It's a psychic mind control like device, except this device is a crystal skull. From an alien. Which just happens to be ridiculously magnetic but not if you cover it with some cloth. The skull is one of 13, a missing one in fact, that when brought back to the original resting place would form this ultimate weapon.
If I wanted to see a movie about aliens and spaceships, I'll just go see any other science fiction film out there. It's not what I expected in an Indy film, and I definately didn't like it. The skull itself is given way too much screen time. Where is the wonder and suspense? The Last Crusade built up the whole movie towards the grail, and the moment when the Ark is found in Raiders is one of wonder. But in this one? It's behind a cut open mummification of some 15th century Spanish conquisitor, just kind of sitting there. But leading up to it, there's a drawn out crawling through cobweb filled passages sequence which doesn't have any danger (bar a scorpion) or intrigue.
What happens to it then? The ruskies capture them as they leave this temple and take them to the jungle, where they meet Marion (from Raiders) and some old friend called Ox. Ox originally had the skull, and put it back, but had stared at it too long in the process. The only way to understand him and find the location of this temple? By getting Indy to stare at it. Right. Only after there was a very slight threat that they would kill Marion. After over twenty years of not seeing her or talking to her, leaving her before their wedding. Why would Indy work so willingly together with the enemy? And he does it with no fight whatsoever, no struggle. Just a "get me a map!"
I just don't get it. Just like how I didn't get Mutt. A 50s greaser wouldn't talk like that, or act like that. He wouldn't be able to fight off a utterly unmenacing Cate Blanchett in a sword fight (coincidently her chosen - and I assume most proficient - weapon) while straddling a gap between two jeeps that are slowly moving apart - all the while having his balls whacked by a number of plants. I mean, what the fuck. And then there's Cate Blanchett's Russian villianess, who was entirely unmenacing. She was no real threat, never was. Then there is Mac, who changed sides so often it just got stupid. And Indy still wanted to save him. He was double crossed twice! Why save him?! I did like John Hurt's crazy portrayal of Ox though.
I couldn't understand the characters, the lack of charm, likeability (or hateability), humour or empathy towards any of them. Harrison was just going through the motions, no substance in what he was doing, no wonder when he worked something out or discovered something. But that is nothing towards some of the outlandish scenes within this film. Surviving an atomic blast by being inside a lead lined refridgerator? Mutt suddenly becoming Tarzan and a horde of monkeys fighting off the villains? The "drysand" scene? The absurd little throwbacks to the previous films (Marcus and Henry Snr's photos on his desk. How did they die? It can't have been old age!)?
But by far the most insanely stupid idea was giant killer ants. It was so stupid I couldn't stop laughing. Ants that devour humans and take them back in their huge anthills. Ants that make a tower out of themselves to try and reach humans out of their reach. Millions and millions of ants. And everyone was running away from them. You know what it reminded me of? Monty Python and the Holy Grail, when they meet the killer rabbit. "Run away, run away!"
Thar be the end of ze spoilers!
Maybe I'm just an old fan whining about these new reincarnations. But it's true. They're never as good as the originals. What happened to the likeable characters, the story that builds up to a climax, the moral underpinnings? Where's the humour? Where's the fun? Mainly, where's the entertainment?
I was not entertained. Not in the least.


